The An Analysis of India’s Trade Flow with BIMSTEC nations- A Gravity Model Approach
Keywords:Gravity model, H-O Samuelson theory, GDP, Economic Growth, Trade, Per capita GDP, Distance, Tax.
At present, the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) represent 22 percent of the global population and carries immense economic promise, with a combined GDP worth $ 3.5 trillion (2018). BIMSTEC have India as the largest economy of the group followed by Bangladesh, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Myanmar and Bhutan. The paper tries to examine the impact of determinants of trade, on trading pattern of India with the BIMSTEC nations, by employing an augmented gravity model on panel data, since its formation for the period of 22 years i.e., from 1997-2018. The paper tries to examine the India’s trade flow within BIMSTEC trading bloc by implying augmented gravity model followed by Egger (2000,2002), Baltagi et al. (2003) and Serlenga and Shin (2007). Several checks have been performed to imply the presence of serial correlation, heteroscedasticity and contemporaneous correlation in the panels. Many other preliminary tests have also been performed to know the crosssectional dependency, stationarity, panel co-integration and normality of variables. The simple panel OLS estimation technique has been used conduct Regression. The study finds out that Heckscher-Ohlin- Samuelson theorem explain the India’s pattern of trade with the bloc. The variables GDP, per capita GDP, Trade GDP ratio, common border and belonging to BIMSTEC has positive impact on the trade between the India and country j. While tax and distance are negatively correlated with total trade of the nations as per our expectations.
Aliyu, S. U., & Bawa, S. (2015). Gravity model by panel data approach: empirical evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 8(1), 42-57. 2. Anderson, J. E. (2016). The gravity model of economic interaction. Boston College and NBER. 3. Baltagi, B.H., Egger, P., Pfaffermayr, M.(2003), "A Generalized Design for Bilateral Trade Flow Models", Economics Letters, 80, p. 391-7. 4. Banik, N. (2006). How promising is BIMSTEC?. Economic and Political Weekly, 52645268. 5. Banik, N. (2007). The BIMSTEC FTA and its relevance. Centre for study in International Relations and Development: Discussion Paper# 36. 6. Batra, A. (2006). India’s Global Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach. Global Economic Review, 35(3), 327–361. 7. Bergstrand, J.H.(1990), "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade", Economic Journal, 100, pp. 121629. 8. Bhargava, A., Franzini, L., Narendranathan, W.(1982), "Serial Correlation and the Fixed Effects Model", Review of Economic Studies, 49, pp. 533-49. 9. Bhattacharyya, R., & Banerjee, T. (2006). Does the gravity model explain India’s direction of trade? A panel data approach. 10. Bhattacharya, S. K., & Bhattacharyay, B. N. (2006). Prospects of regional cooperation in trade, investment and finance in Asia: an empirical analysis on BIMSTEC countries and Japan. 11. Breuss, F., Egger, P.(1999), "How Reliable Are Estimations of East-West Trade Potentials Based on Cross-Section Gravity Analyses?", Empirica, 26, pp. 81 -94. 12. Deluna Jr, R. (2013). Trade performance and potential of the Philippines: an application of stochastic frontier gravity model. 13. Dembatapitiya, P., & Weerahewa, J. (2015). Effects of regional trading agreements on South Asian trade: A gravity model analysis. 14. Egger, P.(2000), "A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation", Economics Letters, 66, pp. 25-31. 15. Egger, P.(2002), "An Econometric View on the Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potentials", World Economy, 25, pp. 297-312. 16. Frankel, J., Rose, A.(2002), "An Estimate of the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade and Income", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, pp. 437-66. 17. Helpman, E., Krugman, P.R.(1985), Market Structure and Foreign Trade, MIT Press, Massachusetts. 18. Helpman, E., Melitz, M., Rubinstein, Y.(2008), "Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, pp. 441-87. 19. Kabir, M., & Salim, R. (2010). Can Gravity Model Explain BIMSTEC's Trade? Journal of Economic Integration, 25(1), 143-165. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/23000969. 20. Kabir, M., Salim, R., & Al-Mawali, N. (2017). The gravity model and trade flows: Recent developments in econometric modeling and empirical evidence. Economic analysis and policy, 56, 60-71. 21. Kepaptsoglou, K., Karlaftis, M. G., & Tsamboulas, D. (2010). The gravity model specification for modeling international trade flows and free trade agreement effects: a 10year review of empirical studies. The open economics journal, 3(1). 22. Kaur, G., & Gupta, A. (2020). India-BIMSTEC Bilateral Trade Activities: A Gravity Model Approach. In Regional Trade and Development Strategies in the Era of Globalization (pp. 126-145). IGI Global. 23. Kaur, G., & Sarin, V. Analysis of Trade Diversion and Trade Creation Effect Between India and Thailand-A Gravity Model Approach. 24. Laskar, S. (2015). Determinants of Trade and FDI flows in the BRICS countries–Evidences from Gravity Model Analysis (Doctoral dissertation). 25. Linder, S.B.(1961), An Essay on Trade and Transformation, John Wiley, New York. 26. Mishra, A. K., Gadhia, J. N., Kubendran, N., & Sahoo, M. (2015). Trade flows between India and other BRICS countries: An empirical analysis using gravity model. Global Business Review, 16(1), 107-122. 27. Narayan, S., & Nguyen, T. T. (2016). Does the trade gravity model depend on trading partners? Some evidence from Vietnam and her 54 trading partners. International Review of Economics & Finance, 41, 220-237. 28. Pesaran, M.H.(2004), "General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels", Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0435, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. 29. Rahman, M., Shadat, W. B., & Das, N. C. (2006). Trade potential in SAFTA: An application of augmented gravity model. CPD occasional paper series, 61, 512. 30. Rasoulinezhad, E., & Jabalameli, F. (2018). Do BRICS Countries Have Similar Trade Integration Patterns?. Journal of Economic Integration, 33(1), 1011-1045. 31. Razzaghi, S., Ali, M., Azad, M., & Sofi, Y. (2012). The Determinants of Trade Flows between D-8 Group Members through Gravity Model. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(6), 5726-5731. 32. Saxena, S., & Bhadauriya, S. (2012). India and Bimstec: An Analysis of India’s Trade Performance & Prospects. Business Analyst: A Refereed Journal of Shri Ram College of Commerce, 33(1), 103-114. 33. Saxena, S., & Bhadauriya, S. (2012). India and Bimstec: An Analysis of India’s Trade Performance & Prospects. Business Analyst: A Refereed Journal of Shri Ram College of Commerce, 33(1), 103-114. 34. Serlenga, L., Shin, Y.(2007), "Gravity Models of Intra-EU Trade: Application of the CCEP-HT Estimation in Heterogeneous Panels with Unobserved Common Time Specific Factors", Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 361-81. 35. Srinivasan, T. N. (2010). Global trading system: decline of nondiscrimination and rise of preferential trade arrangements and agreements. Stan. J. Int'l L., 46, 199. 36. Tan, X. J., & Zhou, M. R. (2015). Export potential of 21st-century Maritime Silk Road and its determinants: an empirical research based on stochastic frontier gravity model. Journal of International Trade, 2, 3-12. 37. Wang, X., & Badman, R. P. (2016). A multifaceted panel data gravity model analysis of Peru's foreign trade. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.01155. 38. World Bank(2008), World Development Indicators 2008, World Bank: Washington, D.C. 39. WTO(2008), Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat - Thailand, WTO, Geneva
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Studies in Economics and Business Relations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.