Remote Work Effectiveness, Quality and Efficiency: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach to Employee Performance

https://doi.org/10.48185/sebr.v6i1.1624

Authors

  • Siti Norayu Mohd Basir Department of Language & General Studies, Faculty of Business & Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis
  • Dr. Mohd Arsat Universiti Malaysia Perlis
  • Dr.Norhafizan
  • Balkis
  • Noor Salwani
  • Norhudi'in

Keywords:

Remote Work, Job Effectiveness, Job Efficiency, Job Quality, Employee Performance

Abstract

The shift to remote work has transformed traditional workplace dynamics, necessitating an evaluation of its impact on employee performance. This study examines the relationships between job effectiveness, job efficiency, and job quality in influencing remote employees' performance. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 132 remote workers through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using inferential statistical methods, including correlation and regression analysis. The findings reveal that job efficiency and job quality significantly enhance employee performance, while job effectiveness does not exhibit a substantial impact. This suggests that in remote work environments, employees who manage their time and resources efficiently and produce high-quality work are more likely to maintain optimal performance levels. The study contributes to the growing body of research on remote work by providing empirical insights that can guide organizations in refining remote work policies to enhance productivity and job satisfaction. Future research should explore additional variables such as work-life balance and mental health to gain a more comprehensive understanding of remote work dynamics.

Published

2025-07-11

How to Cite

Mohd Basir, S. N., Johanis, M. A., Habib Sultan, N., Mohamed Ibrahim, S. B. ., Hussain, N. S. ., & Danu@Danoo, N. . (2025). Remote Work Effectiveness, Quality and Efficiency: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach to Employee Performance. Studies in Economics and Business Relations, 6(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.48185/sebr.v6i1.1624