Collaboration Literacy for Inclusive Education: The Sociometric Paradigm
Keywords:
Collaboration, Inclusive Education, Literacy, Sociometric ParadigmAbstract
Inclusive education, as defined by UNESCO, aims to address the diverse needs of individuals by promoting participation in learning and reducing educational exclusion. Adults, often marginalized in educational pursuits due to age, benefit significantly from collaborative literacy, which supports academic and social development. Collaborative literacy, an essential 21st-century skill, involves the integration of various reading strategies within a group setting, fostering critical thinking and comprehension. Unlike traditional education, adult education prioritizes experiential and problem-solving approaches, making collaborative literacy particularly effective for adult learners. This method not only enhances individual comprehension and critical thinking but also cultivates a collaborative environment conducive to lifelong learning. The concept of collaboration literacy encompasses a comprehensive approach that includes partnership, planning, process, and product, ensuring a cohesive learning experience. It is based on the transactional theory of reading, emphasizing the social context of learning. This approach involves multiple strategies, such as Readers Theatre and Book Club Discussions, to engage learners actively and foster meaningful dialogues. The socio-metric paradigm further refines this concept by considering multi-modal interactions and power dynamics within collaborative groups. Collaboration literacy offers numerous benefits, including improved comprehension, increased student participation, enhanced responsibility, and motivation. It also supports the development of oral proficiency and writing skills. The role of teachers and parents is crucial in creating a supportive environment that encourages active learning and critical thinking. Ultimately, collaborative literacy equips learners with the skills necessary for effective communication and problem-solving in diverse contexts
References
Blaskovich, J. L. (2008). Exploring the effect of distance: An experimental investigation of virtual collaboration, social loafing, and group decisions. Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 27–46.
Callison, D. & Preddy, L. (2006). The Blue book on information age inquiry, instruction and literacy. London, Libraries Unlimited.
Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Millán, E., & Mavrikis, M. (2018). The NISPI framework: Analysing collaborative problem-solving from students' physical interactions. Computers & Education, 116, 93-109.
Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn, 20, 51-76.
Donham, J., Bishop, K., Kuhlthau, C. & Oberg, D. (2001). Inquiry-based learning: lessons from library power. Worthington, OH: Linworth.
Fawcett, L. M., & Garton,A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children’s problem-solving ability. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 157–169.
Granda, R. X., Echeverría, V., Chiluiza, K., & Wong-Villacrés, M. (2015). Supporting the assessment of collaborative design activities in multi-tabletop classrooms. Paper presented at the 2015 Asia- Pacific Conference on Computer Aided System Engineering.
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach: Springer.
Kleinsmann, M., Deken, F., Dong, A., & Lauche, K. (2012). Development of design collaboration skills. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(7), 485-506. doi:10.1080/09544828.2011.619499
Knoll, S.W., Plumbaum, T., Hoffmann, J. L., & De Luca, E.W. (2010). Collaboration ontology:Applying collaboration knowledge to a generic group support system. In G-J. De Vreede (Ed). Proceedings of the Group Decision and Negotiation Conference 2010, Delft, The Netherlands (p.37).
Knowles, M.(1975) Self-Directed learning. Chicago: Follet
Knowles, M.(1984), The Adult learner: A neglected species(3rd Ed.). Houston: Gulf publishing
Knowles, M.(1984) Andragogy in Action. San Fransisco: Josey-Bass
Israel, S. E., Sisk, D., & Block,C.C (1976), Collaborative literacy: using gifted strategies to enrich learning for every student. Royal fireworks press.uk.sagepub.com
Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration:A Literature Review. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/Collaboration Review.pdf
Lubold, N., & Pon-Barry, H. (2014). Acoustic-Prosodic Entrainment and Rapport in Collaborative Learning Dialogues. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2014 ACM workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics Workshop and Grand Challenge, Istanbul, Turkey.
Martinez-Maldonado, R., Echeverria, V., Santos, O. C., Santos, A. D. P. D., & Yacef, K. (2018). Physical learning analytics: A multimodal perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359–377.
Mercier, E. M., Higgins, S., Burd, E., & Joyce-Gibbons, A. (2012). Multi-touch technology to support multiple levels of collaborative learning in the classroom.
Montiel-Overall, P. (2005). A theoretical understanding of teacher and librarian collaboration (TLC). School Libraries Worldwide, 11 (2), 24 – 48.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235-276. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1466609
Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem-solving. In C.E. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp.69–97). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student Behavior and Epistemological Framing: Examples from Collaborative Active-Learning Activities in Physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 147-174. doi:10.1080/07370000902797379
Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2015). Teacher regulation of cognitive activities during student collaboration: Effects of learning analytics. Computers & Education, 90, 80-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.006
Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik,A.W., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 607–651.
Wise, A. F., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 445-470. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9120-1
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Olubunmi Adebola Olanipekun

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.